For next Tuesday’s class, please read and respond to the following (blog entries/comments must be posted by 6 p.m. on Tuesday, June 3rd):
- Maurice Berger’s introduction to The Crisis of Criticism
- Sontag, Susan. “Against Interpretation”
- Saltz, Jerry. “Seeing Out Loud,” The Village Voice, December 16, 2005.
Also — please look over the following reviews (second one on way):
Posted by Rachael Harter: Review: The Ballad of Emmett Till
Questions for Reading:
You don’t have to respond to each author — I’m more interested in your overall response to larger concepts than making sure that you respond to each reading. To help get you started, below are some of questions (or, if something else takes your attention and you want to discuss it, that’s fine, too!):
- Consider Sontag and Saltz’s discussion on art criticism, its drawbacks, its challenges, and their own personal take on how art should(or should not) be approached and/or written about. Which one presents views that is most like your own? Explain why and be sure to reference the readings. Also, you may find that you agree with both on a few points, but neither on all, and that’s fine too — just explain.
- Consider the title of Sontag’s essay, “Against Interpretation.” After reading Sontag, explain your understanding of that title. What is “against interpretation,” how? why? Do you agree or disagree?
- According to Saltz, what is the primary problem with art criticism? why? What examples can you think of (or provide) that exemplify his opinion?
- After reading Berger’s introduction to the book, The Crisis of Criticism, explain why you think criticism is in crisis — in other words, what exactly is the crisis? What is Berger’s view on this crisis? And do you agree or disagree and why?
Feel free to also write on anything else that takes your attention in any of the readings; just be sure to make reference to the readings and explain your response.


